Hey Mike - Thank you, I appreciate the time you have given in replying, but I beg to differ.
When you generate a report that gives you a total value of expenditure against a suppliers card, and then you generate the report right next to it that supposedly gives you a history of the same supplier, then really it should show ALL transactions made under that supplier - whether they be recorded as spend money or not - they are all against the same supplier card - they are all purchases and should be reported as such. If one report can generate a total, the other report could surely show a history to match it.
The whole point of bank rules for recurring transactions is to save time - what good are bank rules for recurring transactions if you can't set them up for this - it asks in the rules for the suppliers card.
The reporting isn't accurate if you can't match a total given in one report, to the history of transactions in the other. I think this is wrong of MYOB to set it up this way if that's the case - it would would make more sense for both reports should show the total of expense with that supplier. If it's only showing half the answer, then the report is useless really.