Hi BronwynHamster , good points and questions, thank you.
I hear you about taking the file offline, working on it, and then putting it back online.
That would be purely related to offline functionality rather than offline backups (these are two main objections/threads being discussed at the moment)
Although taking an offline backup, working in it and then restoring it would have the same outcome as temporarily working in an offline mode.
The AccountRight product manager (and product marketing team) have been working with me around all of the feedback for the change to AccountRight offline functionality (including offline backups).
We wont be able to re-instate offline mode or roll back this change, but we are absolutely looking at ways to try and find solutions to the real concerns customers are raising.
I can't commit that everything will be solved, but we can see that some of the functionality lost through this change is incredibly important to our customers, particularly the super users of AccountRight and we want to find solutions where possible.
The EAP groups will be different every time. If we are trialing a feature around bankfeeds/open banking for example, then we would only be able to take customers with online files who have accounts already connected. Participants are often selected based on their existing feature usage.
As for the size of the businesses involved, this will vary. I think it is often better to avoid larger businesses as they don't have the time to trial new things, to provide us with feedback, and they would see trailing a new feature as a disruption.
BUT on the other hand, by not including larger businesses, we can absolutely miss edge cases. One recent example was with the trail for Single Sign-on, no one involved in the trial was running multiple instances of AccountRight at the same time with different logins for each.
When SSO was launched, this feedback came through loud and clear on the forum, we rolled back the changed and looked into the feedback/scenarios before releasing it again.
*And although we didn't introduce a like for like functionality, we could understand that those users needed to have the same profile added to each account and then they could continue to work as they did previously.
Maintenance notifications is also very valid feedback. This has been a problem throughout 2026 with regular scheduled maintenance happening and in some cases little to no advance notice given to customers. This isn't how we would usually do things but has been necessary this year. I want to acknowledge that this is a poor experience for you and our customers and once things are back to normal, we will make sure to meet your expectations for these kind of changes.